Evidence of Similar Complaints & Transparency Issues Locally

Specific Local Examples

  1. Eastham
    • In February 2025, a long-time resident (Tom McNamara) filed an Open Meeting Law (OML) complaint against the Eastham Select Board. The claim was that the chair had privately discussed her vote (on a residential tax exemption) with another board member in a hallway after a meeting, which may have bypassed a public deliberation. The Provincetown Independent
    • The board discussed the complaint at a subsequent meeting, as required. The Provincetown Independent
  2. Falmouth (School Committee)
    • A recent article mentions that the Falmouth School Committee has a pending OML complaint related to transparency concerns. LocalLens
    • While the article doesn’t give full details of the complaint, it underscores that these issues are also arising in school and education bodies, not just select boards.
  3. State-level & Widespread Trend
    • In 2024, the Massachusetts AGO received 364 OML complaints and issued 262 determination lettersresolving 347 complaints. Mass.gov
    • In over half (54 %) of the reviewed complaints, the AGO found at least one violationMass.gov
    • Common violations are: notice that’s too vague, insufficient detail in minutes, and deliberations outside of posted meetings. Mass.gov
    • In 2021, the AGO reported a record number of OML complaints (over 400 in one year). WJAR

Why This Happens Frequently in Cape & Similar Towns

  • Small boards & informal networks: In small towns, board members often know each other well. It’s easier to slide into communicating “offline” via email or hallway chats, which can cross into “deliberation” territory.
  • Complex administrative details: Topics like salary, personnel, interim appointments, or contract terms can straddle the line between what must be public and what may be discussed privately.
  • Ambiguous notice rules / vague agendas: The Open Meeting Law demands specificity in meeting notices (what topics will be discussed). If boards leave “personnel matters” or “other business” too vague, that becomes a frequent target of complaint.
  • Lack of OML training or awareness: Many local officials are volunteers or part-time, which may mean weaker familiarity with the fine lines of the law. The AGO has responded by ordering more training. Mass.gov+2KP Law, P.C.+2
  • Increasing public scrutiny: Residents today are more attuned and more likely to watch videos, request minutes, and spot inconsistencies.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top